How the five dimensions of access can shape effective youth vaping policy

Young person buying vaping equipment in a shop

The rapid rise in e-cigarette use among young people has become a major talking point in the UK. While vapes can be a helpful tool for adults looking to quit smoking, the increasing number of young people who have never smoked taking up vaping is a significant public health concern.

In response, the UK government is introducing a range of new regulations, from banning disposable vapes to introducing a new vaping products duty. To evaluate the potential effectiveness of such policies, it is helpful to systematically understand the factors facilitating young people's use of vapes.

Using the 'five dimensions of access'

In our latest study, we conducted a systematic review of European research to look at vaping among 11-17 year olds through the lens of the five dimensions of access. This framework, originally designed for healthcare, allowed us to break down the factors influencing youth use into five areas:

  • Affordability: The price of vapes relative to a young person's ability to pay, including the appeal of 'cheap and cheerful' disposable products.
  • Acceptability: The alignment of products with personal preferences and social norms, heavily influenced by industry branding and point-of-sale advertising.
  • Accessibility: The ease of obtaining vapes from commercial sources, often facilitated by inconsistent age verification at smaller retailers or online platforms.
  • Accommodation: The ease of using vapes in restricted settings, supported by the inherent concealability and minimal odour of devices which facilitates 'stealth vaping'.
  • Availability: The overall supply of vapes through both formal retail and informal social networks, such as older siblings or peers.
Infographic titled 'The five dimensions of access: Young people and vaping' illustrating how affordability, acceptability, accessibility, accommodation and availability facilitate e-cigarette use and provide leverage points for policy.

What our research found: implications for policy

Our research indicates that national policy is most effective when targeted at certain dimensions of product regulation. Affordability (via taxation), acceptability (via marketing restrictions), and accessibility (via retailer licensing) represent the primary leverage points for government intervention. These findings align with the current policy context: the government is scheduled to introduce an e-liquid tax in October 2026, while the Tobacco and Vapes Bill provides the necessary powers to regulate point-of-sale displays and implement formal retailer licensing.

Conversely, accommodation remains a significant challenge for policy. Because e-cigarettes are inherently discreet and easy to conceal, regulating their use through traditional 'vape-free' spaces can be difficult. Evidence shows that school-level bans often have limited impact because students can circumvent these rules through 'stealth vaping' in classrooms or bathrooms. This challenge is particularly relevant in the current policy context, as the government is consulting on proposals to introduce new smoke-free, heated tobacco-free and vape-free public spaces in England, including outdoor areas and education settings.

There could also be implications for local policy. By engaging directly with young people local authorities can identify specific geographical pressure points that may not be visible to national policymakers. This approach allows for targeted enforcement at specific retail outlets, such as corner shops where young people perceive age verification to be weak. By focusing on these accessibility challenges, local authorities can complement broader national regulations to more effectively reduce young people's e-cigarette usage.

Why this framework matters

The five dimensions of access framework provides a flexible way to think about emerging nicotine products and different regulatory contexts. For emerging products like nicotine pouches, which offer even greater accommodation (concealability) than vapes, the framework could suggest shifting policy focus toward other dimensions like acceptability or accessibility. Internationally, the framework can be used to analyse different regulatory systems; for instance, examining how Australia's prescription-only model for e-cigarettes shifts availability toward illicit markets and social supply.

Next steps: Modelling the future of youth nicotine policy

Our review also highlights important evidence gaps. While many studies examine individual dimensions such as acceptability, there is still limited understanding of how different access dimensions interact when new policies are introduced or how regulatory changes translate into real-world behaviour.

To bridge these gaps, we are translating our findings, alongside insights from workshops with young people, into a mathematical 'Youth Nicotine Policy Model'. This modelling aligns itself with the recommendations from the SPIRE project, which called for robust modelling on price-based, place-based, and prescriptive policies

Our initial focus will be on estimating the potential impact of upcoming pricing changes, with the aim of supporting future evaluation once policies come into effect. In the longer term, the model could be adapted to explore a wider range of regulatory scenarios, providing a tool to help policymakers anticipate how changes across multiple dimensions of access may influence youth nicotine use.

Further reading

SARG research and projects

National policy and legislation

Supporting evidence and frameworks


Calum Lewis is a PhD student in the Wellcome Trust Doctoral Training Centre in Public Health Economics and Decision Science at the University of Sheffield.

This blog post was based on the following paper:

Lewis C, Gallagher C, Fairbrother H et al (2026) Access-related factors and e-cigarette use among 11–17-year-olds: a thematic synthesis of European studies using the five dimensions of access BMC Public Health DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26692-y